With the White House and the media still abuzz about the possibility of life on Mars, NASA seized the moment to announce another "possible lifew site" in our solar system, Jupiters moon Europa.1 In the case of Europa, the so-called evidence for life requires a truly enormous stretch of the imagination, and it exposes the degree to which the notion "where theres water theres life" has become entrenched.
Slightly smaller than our moon and orbiting Jupiter at a distance of about 400,000 miles, Europa was photographed in August by the Galileo probe. A few years ago, Voyagers images showed us that Europas surface is full of cracks, but Galileo passed close enough (just 96,000 miles out) to provide some detail. 2 Because the closer the closer view of the cracks resembles what we see at the edges of Earths arctic ice cap, some members of the Galileo team hypothesized that pieces of Europas chilly crust may have "cracked apart, moved slightly, and then frozen together again." 3 If that happened, there must be some kind of plastic or liquid medium below the surface, a medium such as water, for instance. Reporters (nudged by a few "wishful thinking" scientists, perhaps), jumped from that tenuous series of speculations to the announcement that Europa is a possible life site.
In case you are called upon to explain whats so improbable about this idea to an individual who doesnt yet question the water = life myth, let me outline just a few of its difficulties. First, we face the lack of a heat source to thaw the mantle layers and the frozen crust (which may or may not be mostly frozen water). Tidal friction resulting from Europas proximity to Jupiter has been suggested. Though this friction would be great indeed, my rough calculations indicate it falls far short of what would be necessary to melt such an enormous body of ice. I must mention, in addition, that several moons orbiting closer to Jupiter, thus subject to more intense tidal pull, show no signs of surface cracking.
Second, Europas gravity is too weak to hold onto liquid water at (or near) the surface. If the melting-cracking-refreezing scenario were true, Europas water would be long gone into space, more precisely into whats called the "interplanetary medium," the thin veil of gas and a few dust particules occupying the space between planets. All this speculation may become moot when Galileo passes Europa within 400 miles sometime early in 1997.
The popularity of the assumption that liquid water and a few other chemicals in solution are the only requirements for life4 suggests two things to me: 1) the weakness of modern science education; and 2) the strength of spiritual darkness. We depend upon Gods resources to combat both.
This page, and all contents, are Copyright © 1996 by Reasons To Believe.
Return to the
Reasons To Believe Home Page
Return to the table of contents for the Facts & Faith, Fourth Quarter 1996 Issue