Intelligent Design MovementA Comment on Humility Theology
1/1/2002 The anthropic principle faces serious challenges from outside the disciplines of astronomy and physics. Many scholars in the humanities and social sciences fear that the anthropic principle will somehow legitimize false notions of human supremacy, justifying exploitation of the environment to the detriment of other species. Creation Scientists Applaud PA Judge's Ruling Against 'Intelligent Design'-Dressing Up ID Is No Substitute for Real Science
12/20/2005 News Advisory, Dec. 20---Proponents of 'intelligent design' were dealt a blow when District Judge John E. Jones III ruled that ID was a religious idea with a covert agenda and therefore unconstitutional. Creation vs. Evolution: Why a Model Is Essential
8/25/2008 The public debate about teaching intelligent design has exposed widespread confusion both inside and outside the church about how the scientific enterprise operates. One of the most frequent complaints scientists make about the Intelligent Design movement is that their brand of intelligent design is not testable, falsifiable, or predictive. More Than Intelligent Design
7/1/2002 Scholars involved in what has come to be known as “the Intelligent Design movement” deserve respect. They swim against the powerful tide of naturalism, and I applaud their efforts and integrity. President's Laptop- July 2001- More Than Intelligent Design
7/1/2001 More Than Intelligent Design: Several people have asked me how RTB relates to the Intelligent Design (I.D.) movement. Certainly, our message overlaps, but our approach differs. We claim the evidence identifies Jesus Christ as the Designer. Intelligent design proponents think it is more prudent given non-theists’ resistance, to establish first the existence of some undefined intelligent designer. RTB Scholars Expound on EXPELLED, the Movie
9/1/2008 "A follow-up to our original statement on EXPELLED:" Our initial posting about EXPELLED, the movie, drew a mixture of praise and criticism. We are grateful for both. Praise is always encouraging, but criticism can be helpful in revealing miscommunication. Should Intelligent Design Be Taught in Public Schools?
9/1/2005 George W. Bush ignited a fire storm of controversy last month when he responded to a reporter's question. Even though he never mentioned intelligent design, many in the media presumed that he endorsed teaching both evolution and intelligent design (ID) in public schools. The Shell Game of Evolution and Creation
1/1/1987 The many debates, court cases, letters to the editor, and talk shows on the subject of evolution and creation almost without exception demonstrate the shell game played with the terms creationism, evolution, science, religion, and faith. Turning the Microscope on Intelligent Design, Part 1 of 2
9/18/2008 Invention of a New Type of Microscope Delineates the Difference between ID and Science Turning the Microscope on Intelligent Design, Part 2 of 2
9/25/2008 Invention of a New Type of Microscope Delineates the Difference between ID and Science Unmasking Misconceptions: Book reviews of The Hidden Face of God and Darwin's God
1/1/2002 Book Review: The Hidden Face of God: How Science Reveals the Ultimate Truth. By Gerald L. Schroeder. New York: The Free Press, 2001. Intelligent Design MovementLouisiana Governor Signs Controversial Education Bill
Author: Dr. Hugh Ross and Dr. Fazale ("Fuz") Rana Poll: Creationism, Intelligent Design Still Taught in U.S. Classroom
Author: Dr. Jeff Zweerink The Best of Science News Flash
Hugh Ross, Fuz Rana, Jeff Zweerink, and Joe Aguirre Intelligent Design Movement |
|
|