Reasons to Believe

Feathered Dinosaur or Flightless Bird?

A recent collaborative study by scientists from Oregon State, Purdue (at Fort Wayne), Johns-Hopkins, and the College of Charleston provides evidence that the once highly touted feathered dinosaur, Caudipteryx, was more likely a flightless bird.1

Caudipteryx first appeared in the scientific literature in 1998, when it was recovered from the Chaomidianzi Formation in the Liaoning province of China.2 At the time, the specimen (dated between 145 and 125 million years old) was described as a key transitional intermediate between the bipedal theropod dinosaurs and birds.3 This assertion was based on the fact that Caudipteryx possessed fully formed feathers identical to those found on birds.

This interpretation of the find has not been the only one, however.4 Many reasons have arisen for rejecting it. Some have been presented in previous issues of RTBs newsletter.5 The chief argument stems from what is known by paleontologists as the temporal paradox. Namely, Caudipteryx shows up in the fossil record after the oldest known bird, Archaeopteryx. 6-7

If Caudipteryx is not a transitional intermediate leading to birds, how then do scientists account for the similarities between birds and theropods? In a word, convergence. A widely observed phenomenon in the biological realm, convergence refers to the sharing of common anatomical characteristics by unrelated organisms. Since both birds and theropods are bipeds, it is not surprising that they would possess convergent, (i.e., similar) features. Recent research on the foot structure of birds and theropods supports the case for convergence over the case for shared ancestry.

Both organisms have three elongated digits that point forward, one digit that points backward, and one digit that is greatly diminished in size. Though these parallels initially suggest a bird-dinosaur ancestral relationship, careful analysis reveals fundamental differences. For example, theropods forward pointing digits are I-II-III, whereas birds are II-III-IV.8-9 Analysis of footprints shows significant differences between the two types of creatures with respect to digit I function, foot posture, and hindlimb excursion.10

To these differences in foot structure, scientists can now add the differences identified by Terry Jones and his research team.11-12 This group compared the center of mass and the hindlimb length to body-length ratio for flightless birds and bipedal dinosaurs. The differences were marked. The teams analysis also revealed significant differences in the bipedalism of theropods and flightless birds. When flightless birds walk, they leave their upper leg relatively stationary while swinging the lower leg (below the knee). This description fits Caudipteryx, too. By contrast, bipedal dinosaurs used their entire leg to walk.

Jones's analysis indicates that Caudipteryx is more likely a flightless bird that appeared on earth after Archaeopteryx. Caudipteryx can no longer be considered a dinosaur-bird transitional intermediate, nor does it appear that Caudipteryx is a feathered theropod that happens to possess convergent features with birds. The next step will be to determine if the other feathered theropods, such as Protarchaeopteryx, possessed bipedalism similar to that of flightless birds.

The evolutionary paradigm simply cannot explain the origin of birds. Meanwhile, the biblical account of bird origins found in Genesis 1:20-21 best matches the record of nature.

References:

  1. Terry D. Jones, et al., Cursoriality in Bipedal Archosaurs, Nature 406 (2000): 716-18.
  2. Ji Qiang et al., Two Feathered Dinosaurs from Northeastern China, Nature 393 (1998): 753-61.
  3. Ann Gibbons, Dinosaur Fossils, in Fine Feather, Show Link to Birds, Science 280 (1998): 2051.
  4. R. Monastersky, Feathered Dinosaurs Found in China, Science News 153 (1998): 404.
  5. Hugh Ross, Darwinisms Fine Feathered FriendsA Matter of Interpretation, Facts and Faith 12, no. 3 (1998): 1-3.
  6. Alan Feduccia, The Origin and Evolution of Birds, 2d ed. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999), 382.
  7. Fazale (Fuz) R. Rana, New Challenge to the Bird-Dinosaur Link, Connections 2, no. 2 (2000): 3.
  8. Richard Hinchliffe, The Forward March of Bird-Dinosaurs Halted? Science 278 (1997): 596-97.
  9. Ann C. Burke and Alan Feduccia, Developmental Patterns and Identification of Homologies in the Avian Hand, Science 278 (1997): 666-68.
  10. Stephen M. Gatesy, Three-Dimensional Preservation of Foot Movements in Triassic Theropod Dinosaurs, Nature 399 (1999): 141-44.
  11. Jones, 716-18.
  12. S. Perkins, Feathered Fossil Still Stirs Debate, Science News 158 (2000): 119.

 

Subjects: Dinosaurs, Dinosaurs to Birds Transitions, Transitional Forms

Dr. Fazale Rana

In 1999, I left my position in R&D at a Fortune 500 company to join Reasons to Believe because I felt the most important thing I could do as a scientist is to communicate to skeptics and believers alike the powerful scientific evidence—evidence that is being uncovered day after day—for God’s existence and the reliability of Scripture. Read more about Dr. Fazale Rana