Reasons to Believe

Eliminating Oscillating Universe Models

TNRTB Archive - Retained for reference information

Evidence against some oscillating universe models contrasts with successful predictions of RTB’s cosmic creation model. The theological implications of the beginning of a big-bang universe are well known and have motivated many scientists to propose alternative models with no beginning. One class of models avoids a beginning by postulating that the universe repeatedly expands and then collapses back on itself. The cycle repeats, with the universe “bouncing” after each collapse. Recent theoretical calculations rule out a substantial number of these models motivated by string theory. The growing body of evidence against bouncing cosmologies stands in stark contrast to the ever-increasing weight of evidence supporting RTB’s cosmic creation model, which holds that a supernatural Creator caused the universe in a “big bang.”

o   C. P. Constantinidis et al., “Falsifying Tree Level String Motivated Bouncing Cosmologies,” Physical Review D 73 (2006): 123513.

o   http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v73/e123513

·         Related Resource

o   Hugh Ross, “A Beginner’s—and Expert’s—Guide to the Big Bang”

·         Product Spotlight

o   Journey Toward Creation, 2nd ed., with Hugh Ross

Subjects: Big Bang

Dr. Hugh Ross

Reasons to Believe emerged from my passion to research, develop, and proclaim the most powerful new reasons to believe in Christ as Creator, Lord, and Savior and to use those new reasons to reach people for Christ. Read more about Dr. Hugh Ross.