Light Travel Time and the Cosmology of Russell HumphreysAvoiding a Dangerous Trap1/1/1999 Have you ever wondered why most Christian astronomers reject a young-universe interpretation of Genesis? The answer has to do with Scripture and theology, as well as with science. In my book Creation and Time (not to be confused with the book by the same title subsequently produced by Van Bebber and Taylor), I state that the rules of biblical exegesis support long creation days, an old earth, and an even older universe.' If the creation periods are interpreted as six consecutive 24-hour days, other books of the Bible and other chapters of Genesis become contradictory. Continuous Cosmic Expansion10/1/2005 Big bang opponents are a diverse lot. Some promote an infinitely (or near infinitely) old universe to avoid a creation event in the relatively recent (roughly 14-billion-year) past. So, they argue that the universe is static or semi-static-no general cosmic expansion. Others promote a very young creation (6,000-10,000 years old) to fit a particular interpretation of Genesis 1. Exchanges Between Dr. Hugh Ross And Dr. Russell HumphreysExchanges between Dr. Hugh Ross and Dr. Russell Humphreys In response to repeated inquiries about public statements made by Dr. Russell Humphreys concerning his desire to debate Dr. Hugh Ross about differences between young-earth vs. old-earth cosmic creation models, Dr. Ross posted a general statement about the necessary parameters for such a debate in August of 2002. Historic Age Debate: Beginning Of Time7/14/2008 Previously, we noted that the church has unanimously taught the doctrine of creation ex nihilo throughout its history (parts 1-4). This was considered fundamental doctrine and was even included in key creedal statements. The doctrine of creation ex nihilo does, however, have one curious implication: a beginning of time. In other words, if matter has a beginning (i.e., is not eternal) then shouldn’t time have a beginning as well? Historic Age Debate: Creation Ex Nihilo, Part 1 (of 4)June 16, 2008 On October 2007, I began a TNRTB series discussing my research into how the church has understood Genesis 1 and the age of the earth throughout its history. The first two articles gave a quick overview of this topic (see “Overview,” part 1 and part 2). From here on, this series will focus on how earlier theologians interpreted specific Bible verses or wrestled with issues pertaining to the age of the earth. Historic Age Debate: Creation Ex Nihilo, Part 2 (of 4)6/23/2008 The doctrine of creation ex nihilo (“creation out of nothing”) has been firmly and uniformly taught throughout church history and was declared in important creedal statements (detailed in part 1). To understand why this was such a vital doctrine, we need to first consider the contrasting view prevalent throughout the Greco-Roman world at the time of Christ. Historic Age Debate: Creation Ex Nihilo, Part 3 (of 4)6/30/2008 The most important biblical doctrine related to creation is creation ex nihilo, which means “creation out of nothing.” This theologically fundamental belief was taught in important creedal statements [part 1]. It represents a clear line of demarcation between Christianity and Greek philosophy, which held that matter was eternal [part 2]. Historic Age Debate: Creation Ex Nihilo, Part 4 (of 4)7/7/2008 Parts 1-3 of this series have documented the vital theological importance of the doctrine of creation ex nihilo (“creation out of nothing”). Now it is time to consider its impact on science. Three specific examples will be considered here. Introduction To The Creation-date Debate2/17/2009 There are a wide variety of types of creationists in Christianity. By types we mean different interpretations of the days in Genesis. Two overarching views are young-earth and old-earth creationism. Reasons to Believe and others have shown (see links within this article) that it and others believe young-earthism is not the literal interpretation of Genesis and is wrought with interpretational and scientific problems. This article will attempt to introduce readers to this position and why we believe it is valid. Most Accurate Distances Shore Up Creation History3/3/2008 Opponents of big bang cosmology, both atheists and young-earth creationists, frequently attempt to push aside very compelling and overwhelming physical evidence in favor of this biblically predicted model1 by picking apart the limiting factor in determining the details of the cosmic creation story. This limiting factor is the ability of astronomers to determine accurate distances to other galaxies. Responses To Young Universe "answers"1/1/1999 Those who hold the young universe view have offered the following statements to answer questions about this theory. After each statement is a response. The Unraveling Of Starlight And TimeFinal Revision March 22, 1999 Light Travel Time and the Cosmology of Russell HumphreysCreation Update PRIMETIME #5Hugh Ross, Fuz Rana, Kenneth Samples Early Human Migration Mystery SolvedHugh Ross, Fuz Rana, Kenneth Samples, and Krista Bontrager Evaluating Some Common Young-Earth ArgumentsGuest apologists Mark Whorton and Hill Roberts with Joe Aguirre Hezekiah’s Tunnel: Another Confirmation of the Bible’s Historical AccuracyHugh Ross, Fuz Rana, and Krista Bontrager More Confirmation for Cosmic Creation ModelHugh Ross, Fuz Rana, and Joe Aguirre NASA Experiments Confirm CreationHugh Ross, Kenneth Samples and Krista Bontrager Observational Concessions of Young-Earth CosmologyHugh Ross, Fuz Rana, and Krista Bontrager Prime Time #2 - God, Darwin or Both?Hugh Ross, Kenneth Samples, Fuz Rana and Dave Rogstad Primetime #14 - Special Edition: Interviews with Don Stoner & Brother Guy ConsolmagnoHugh Ross, Fuz Rana and Krista Bontrager PRIMETIME #3 - Interview with Young-Earth Astronomer, Dr. Danny FaulknerHugh Ross, Dave Rogstad and Krista Bontrager Quantized Red Shifts: Evidence of an Earth-Centered Universe?Hugh Ross, Dave Rogstad, Fuz Rana and Krista Bontrager Response to "15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense" in Scientific AmericanHugh Ross, Fuz Rana and Krista Bontrager Using Time Dilation to Test Cosmological ModelsHugh Ross, Fuz Rana and Krista Bontrager Young-Earth Creationism: Interview with Dr. John Mark ReynoldsHugh Ross, Fuz Rana and Krista Bontrager Light Travel Time and the Cosmology of Russell HumphreysA Matter of DaysPrice: $15.95 The length of time represented by the word "day" sparks a storm of controversy. Lightning strikes and thunder roars with questions at the core of the debate: Astronomical Evidence (Japanese)Price: $6.00 Explores in twenty-four pages the reasons to believe in the God of the Bible, based on astronomy. Level: All readers Creation and Time (Japanese)Price: $15.00 Hugh Ross looks closely at one of the most commonly held beliefs among Christians and non-Christians alike: that science and Scripture contradict one another about the age of the earth and how the universe began. After a look back to the beginning of the science-faith conflict, Dr. Ross explores what the early church fathers believed, what the biblical texts indicate, and what the scientific data tell us regarding the age of the universe. He concludes with a strategy for peaceful resolution of what has become an emotionally-charged battle. Level: All readers Mysteries ExaminedPrice: $19.95 Joshua's Long Day: For centuries two Scripture passages have puzzled believers and served as "proof" for skeptics that the Bible contains myth and legend: Joshua's long day and Hezekiah's backward-moving sundial. Astronomer Dr. Hugh Ross evaluates the plausibility of various hypotheses explaining these mysterious events. The John Ankerberg Debate: Young-Earth vs. Old-EarthPrice: $24.95 Plays in all DVD players (Region Code 0) In a rare debate appearance, Hugh Ross presents and defends the biblical basis for believing that the earth is a few billions (not thousands) of years old. Speaking for the young-earth position is Kent Hovind, educator, author, and popular speaker. Their venue: The John Ankerberg Show, televised nationally on the Inspiration Network. This lively exchange allows viewers to contrast the two views and evaluate arguments for and against each. Level: All 1 DVD (160 minutes, published 2000), 06 oz. |
|
|







